Legal Opinion

Smoot v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1938No. 27808PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, W. T. Smoot, filed in the district court of Beckham county an action to foreclose a mortgage which was tried to a jury resulting in a verdict for defendant. Motion for a new trial was filed, overruled on the 21st day of June, 1935', and an order was entered providing “* * * that the time in which the plaintiff shall make and serve a case-made be ex-. tended 60 days in which to make and serve a case-made, * * * that defendant have ten days to suggest amendments and that either party could settle case-made on five days’ notice. On August 12, 1935, and October 17, 1935, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cherry v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Staner v. McGrathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Jones v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. R. & R. Motor Co. v. Kings, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Lena v. ClinkenbeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free & Accepted Masons of State v. DraperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API