Legal Opinion

In re Sossner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 5, 2013Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany.

By decision dated April 8, 2010, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for three years, which suspension was conditionally stayed (Matter of Sossner, 72 AD3d 1268 [2010] ). Respondent now moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that the conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

Rose, J.E, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re SossnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API