Rosenberg Diamond Development Corp. v. Employers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff Rosenberg Diamond Development Corporation (“Rosenberg”) appeals from the decision of the district court (Castel, J.) granting summary judgment to the defendant, Employers Insurance Company of Wausau (‘Wausau”). The district court found that Wausau, which insures Rosenberg for Comprehensive General Liability (“CGL”), had no duty to defend Rosenberg in a Fair Housing Act case brought against Rosenberg by the Association of Community…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Northville Industries Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- First Investors Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Mary & Alice Ford Nursing Home Co. v. Fireman's Insurance of NewarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooklyn Center for Psychotherapy, Inc. v. Philadelphia IndemnityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020