Legal Opinion

Sand v. Steinberg

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, David C., J.

An examination of the papers fails to disclose a copy of the note upon which this action is based. From the data which the court gathered at the time of the argument, I take it that the promissory note was signed as follows:

“ Thomas Gerson, borrower;
“ Dorothy Gerson, wife of borrower (comaker);
“ Michael Sand, comaker (indorser);
“ Benjamin Steinberg, comaker (indorser).”

The plaintiff, Michael Sand, seeks contribution against the defendant Benjamin Steinberg on the theory that there were only two indorsers and, therefore, is entitled to recoup from Steinberg as a coindorser…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Easterly v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salzberg v. DeutschCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  2. Slutsky v. LefttCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API