Legal Opinion

Horton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1996No. 95-3472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the order denying Horton’s motion for writ of error coram nobis, post-conviction relief, and/or to correct sentence. We are unpersuaded by Horton’s argument that he is entitled to credit for time served against his probation sentence, imposed upon revocation of probation, for the period of time that elapsed before the probation violation charge was adjudicated. During that time, Horton was incarcerated on an unrelated conviction. Credit for time spent on probation begins on the date the probation order is entered, and ends on the date the probation violation has occurred, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Fellman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Francois v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Weeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Tonnessen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API