Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1900Published

Motion after trial and verdict to dismiss the complaint, and set aside the verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The plaintiff asks, upon a reserved motion after trial and verdict, to dismiss the complaint and set aside the verdict for $5,000, which the jury gave the plaintiff by assessment of damages and special findings of fact, all in plaintiff’s favor.

On the 17th of April, 1899, the. plaintiff, a boy about eight years of age, on a bright day, undertook to cross the tracks of the defendant near Ninety-fourth street, on Columbus avenue, in the city of New York, midway between the cross walks forming the northern boundary of Ninety-third street and the southern boundary of Ninety-fourth street, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caspers v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Greenberg v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Bello v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Mixsell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API