Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Kaiser

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1933No. Appeal, 315PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Defendant engaged in trading in grain futures with plaintiffs, who are commodity brokers, with membership in the Chicago Board of Trade. In the course of his dealings, he deposited with them $18,500 as margins on his transactions. Ultimately plaintiffs sold him out because of his failure to keep his accounts adequately covered and when this was done, he was indebted to them in the sum of $5,695.17, which he refused to pay. Plaintiffs brought suit to recover this sum and defendant filed a counterclaim for the amount of his deposit. On the trial of the case the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Bailey v. BensleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Greene v. CoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Penna. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API