Legal Opinion

McNeese v. Raines

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 12, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee, who was the defendant in the court below files a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the judgment rendered was not a final one. Appellee had filed a demurrer to the complaint of appellant in the court below on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him. The court sustained the demurrer, and the judgment of the court from which the appeal comes is as follows:

“Now on this day comes the defendant T. G-. Raines, by his attorney, W. P. Smith, and files its [his] separate demurrer to the complaint of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Melton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Barrentine v. Henry Wrape Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Durben v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Hall v. WatersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Kory v. LessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Robinson v. PringleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Harlow v. RylandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Thompson v. SemmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API