Legal Opinion
Aiken v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 6, 1999No. 98-01597PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
742 So.2d 811 (1999)
Conray AIKEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-01597.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
August 6, 1999.
Michael L. Benito of Fernandez & Benito, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
EN BANC
2Per curiam
Conray Aiken appeals his judgment and sentences. Aiken argues that his conviction for aggravated assault with a firearm is barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause because he was also convicted of sexual battery with a firearm and both convictions…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Blanchard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Duhart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
4Cited by5 opinions
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Schirmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Valdes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007