Ex parte Tinkoff
District Court, N.D. Illinois
- Separate petitions by Ella Hutchinson Tinkoff, on behalf of Pay-soff Tinkoff, by Steve Zozaski, by Hugo Carlson, and by Victor Zu-kowski, for writs of habeas corpus, to secure release from military service, into which they were drafted under Selective Service Act May 18, 1917.
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, District Judge.
These applications are for writs of ha-beas corpus to release or exempt persons from service in the National Army created by Act May 18, 1917, c. 15, 40 Stat. 76.
The Tinkoff application asserts that he registered on June 5, and that three weeks thereafter he married. Later he asked the local board to exempt him from service, his ground of exemption being the dependency of his wife; the local board granted his claim and denied an application which he made to file additional affidavits in support of his allowed claim. From the local board’s order in TinkofPs favor the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Angelus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- In Re LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States ex rel. Koopowitz v. FinleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex Parte GreenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- United States Ex Rel. Filomio v. PowellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Shimola v. Local Board No. 42 for Cuyahoga CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
- Local Draft Board No. 1 v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Briggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.