Legal Opinion
McMillan v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2017No. 13-73139UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed in this case on May 15, 2017, is amended by the attached amended memorandum disposition. With this amended memorandum disposition, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and recommend denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc.
The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested a vote for en banc consideration.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. The panel will not consider any further petitions for rehearing in response to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- August C. Wolf Muriel M. Wolf v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sparkman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- William D. Little v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Steven G. Hill Parilea Hill v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Joseph E. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Denise Celeste McMillan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019