City and County of Denver v. Currigan
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton
The parties are here in the same order they appeared in the trial court. We will refer to plaintiffs in error by name, as plaintiffs or as the City, and to the defendants in error by name or as defendants.
The action was commenced to obtain an order requiring defendant Currigan, as Auditor of the City and County of Denver, to execute, register and countersign a certain contract which had been submitted to him. The trial court refused to enter such an order. The present proceedings were initiated to review the ruling of the trial court.
The plaintiffs are the City and County of Denver, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Tukey v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Marks v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Harding v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Fisher v. MinshallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friends of Chamber Music v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Busse v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Interstate Trust Building Co. v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Gardner v. Davis CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1974