Legal Opinion

Lord v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 18, 1934No. Docket No. 59385Published

Petitioner's right to receive corporate stock was initiated while he was domiciled in the State of Oregon. His removal to the State of Washington before receipt of the stock did not change the character of it from separate to community property, and the income represented by the proceeds of the sale of the stock was taxable to petitioner as his separate income.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT H. LORD, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Lord v. Commissioner

Docket No. 59385.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 425; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1329;

April 18, 1934, Promulgated

Petitioner's right to receive corporate stock was initiated while he was domiciled in the State of Oregon. His removal to the State of Washington before receipt of the stock did not change the character of it from separate to community property, and the income represented by the proceeds of the sale of the stock was taxable to petitioner as his separate income.

Ralph H. Cake, Esq., for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lord v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API