Legal Opinion
Morales v. Hickman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 14, 2006No. C 06-219 JF, C 06-926 JF RSPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
415 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2006)
Michael Angelo MORALES, Plaintiff,
v.
Roderick Q. HICKMAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; Steven W. Ornoski, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison; and Does 1-50, Defendants.
Nos. C 06-219 JF, C 06-926 JF RS.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.
February 14, 2006.
David A. Senior, McBreen & Senior, Los Angeles, CA, John R. Grele, Law Office of John R. Grele, San Francisco, CA, Richard P. Steinken, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.
Habeas Corpus Resource Center, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nelson v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Campbell v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Lightbourne v. McCollumSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Brown v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Diaz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Morales v. TiltonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.