Legal Opinion
Barfield v. . Carr
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 6, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This action is brought to determine the rights of (575) plaintiffs and defendants under the will of Adam Hinson. The will was found soon after testator's death, the sixth item being canceled and obliterated in part as follows:
"6. It is my will and desire that all the residue of my property, after the sale of the real estate provided in above section, shall be divided equally and paid over, share and share alike, to each of the following, to wit:
"To my niece Elizabeth Barfield one share. "To my niece Lillian Phillips one share. A. R. Hinson. "To my nephew Alex. Hagan one share. "To my niece…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cutler v. Cutler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Battle v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Duckworth v. Jordan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- In Re Will of WellbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Saunders v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Stuart v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931