Relander v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin
The primary issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to amend his complaint after a summary judgment had been entered disposing of all the plaintiffs claims against the defendant, a Supreme Court Rule 304(a) finding of appealability (134 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)) had been made in connection with the summary judgment, and the time for appealing from that judgment had passed without the plaintiff filing a motion for leave to amend his complaint. We hold that under the facts of this case the trial court properly refused to allow the plaintiff to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Sears v. SearsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- People Ex Rel. Burris v. Progressive Land Developers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Addison Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Kupianen v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EMC Mortgage Corp. v. KempIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Board of Education of Sunset Ridge School District No. 29 v. Village of NorthbrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Montano v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Royal Oak Condominium Ass'n v. StevensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025
- Montano v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.