Legal Opinion

People v. Triscari

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record does not support the argument of defendant that his plea of guilty was coerced by the need to seek medical treatment. When defendant indicated that he felt forced into taking a plea by his need for medical treatment, Supreme Court discontinued the proceedings and stated that it would not accept a plea on that basis. Defendant was allowed to confer with his attorney, and only then admitted to the factual allegations underlying the charges. The record supports the conclusion that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CreechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. GreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. NeithardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API