Legal Opinion

Greenwich Insurance v. Oregon Improvement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by the Greenwich Insurance Company against the Oregon Improvement Company and others to recover a pro rata portion of a premium on a policy of insurance issued by plaintiff. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.'

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover from the defendants a pro rata or earned portion of a premium on a policy of insurance issued by the plaintiff. The complaint alleged that the insurance was made at the request, and for the benefit and advantage, of the defendants, and that the policy was continued in force until about the 20th of March, 1891, when it was canceled at the request of the defendants, pursuant to the terms thereof; and that the pro rata or earned premium up to the date of the cancellation of said policy was the sum of $1,503.76, and that the defendants promised and agreed to pay…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carroll v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hare v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Reitz v. KrystofowiczNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Richard v. Connecticut Electric Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Balz v. ShawNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API