Legal Opinion
Keo v. Kimball Brooklands Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered November 21, 1991, which granted defendant DiConstanzo’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
As managing agent of the apartment complex in which plaintiff Vesna Keo was injured in an incinerator explosion, *680defendant DiConstanzo (defendant) could be subject to liability for nonfeasance only if he were in complete and exclusive control of the management and operation of the building (Jones v Park Realty, 168 AD2d 945 [appeal No. 2], affd for reasons stated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gardner v. 1111 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Gardner v. 1111 Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Jones v. Park RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Jones v. Park RealtyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ioannidou v. Kingswood Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ingordo v. Square Plus Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cortes v. Riverbridge Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lennon v. Oakhurst Gardens Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.