Legal Opinion

Palm Bay International, Inc. v. Marchesi Di Barolo S.P.A.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 11, 2011No. CV 09-599(ADS)(AKT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

ARTHUR D. SPATT, District Judge.

The plaintiffs Palm Bay International, Inc., (“Palm Bay”) and David S. Taub and Marc Taub (the “Taubs”) (collectively the “plaintiffs”) move for a post-judgment ruling granting to them a judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”) 50(b) or, in the alternative, a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motions are denied in part and granted in part.

I. THE BACKGROUND

The facts in this case were initially stated in the Court’s prior…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Willie Smith v. Nurse Carpenter, Superintendent Wilkinson, Superintendent at Pharsalia Corr. FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drapkin v. Mafco Consolidated Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API