Rush v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
The defendant appeals from his conviction of possession of a controlled substance.
1. The defendant, when arrested for reckless driving, was in a condition of apparent intoxication. In a search of the vehicle, authorized not only "for the purposes of obtaining evidence with regard to the defendant’s intoxication or the cause thereof’’(Howe v. State, 132 Ga. App. 840 (209 SE2d 258)) but also by the defendant’s voluntary consent (see McKendree v. State, 133 Ga. App. *388295 (211 SE2d 154) and cits.), a package of cocaine was seized from inside the defendant’s guitar after it slid…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- High v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- State v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- State v. HoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Stoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.