Legal Opinion

Marte v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiff had the right-of-way when she was hit by a bus (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1111 [a] [1]; § 1112 [a]; see also Calcano v Rodriguez, 91 AD3d 468, 468-469 [2012]). Although a nonparty witness asserted in an affidavit that plaintiff “had the green/walk signal and was walking within the crosswalk” when she was hit by the bus, defendant bus driver testified that she was about a car length south of the crosswalk when she was hit. At this procedural posture, the truth of the bus driver’s testimony is presumed “where the court’s duty is to find issues…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Powell v. HIS Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robles v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Robles v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API