Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 2000No. 2D99-4753PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

754 So.2d 149 (2000)

Charles ARNOLD, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D99-4753.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 24, 2000.

2Per curiam

Charles Arnold appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Arnold alleges that the written judgment and sentence entered in his case does not comport with the oral pronouncement in that the written sentencing document reflects a twenty year habitual felony offender prison sentence while the oral pronouncement did not provide for a habitual offender…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Driver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Yates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. James v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Bowleg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API