Legal Opinion
Sands v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 13, 1996No. 95-2830Published
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We remand, however, so that the court may vacate defendant’s firearm conviction. The record reveals that the trial court failed to follow this court’s mandate in Sands v. State, 547 So.2d 293, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), *703wherein we “vaeate[d] the defendant’s conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense.”
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sands v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989