Legal Opinion
Pandick, Inc. v. Rooney
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 16, 1986No. 85 C 6779PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DUFF, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint which alleges violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a), (b) and (d).
FACTS
It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff Pandick, Inc., (“Pandick”), which is in the business of supplying financial printing services, competes with defendant Charles P. Young (“CPY”) in a national market and with CPY’s subsidiary, defendant Charles P. Young, Chicago (“CPY, Chicago”) in the Chicago market. It is further alleged that CPY, Chicago has a “dominant share”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. KapoorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Rylewicz v. Beaton Services, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.