Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Moore

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of the Court:

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by Moore & Aikin against Samuel Caruthers as executor of James M. Caruthers, deceased. The defendant'pleaded, \.,neunqurs executor : — 2, fully administered ; 8, non assumpsit.

*87The plaintiffs proved that James M. Caruthers had his domicil in Bolivar county, in the State of Mississippi, and died on the 12th of January, 1848, leaving his family and property there. Soon after his death, the defendant made some arrangement with the widow of said James M., and, before administration had been granted in Mississippi,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Skiff v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. McIntyre v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Douglas v. CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Clark v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Minor v. . BeveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API