Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1992No. 19106Published

1Opinion of the Court

833 P.2d 911 (1992)

122 Idaho 278

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Michael E. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19106.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 1992 Term.

June 24, 1992.

Daniel P. Featherston, Sandpoint, for defendant-appellant.

Larry J. EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., and Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

BISTLINE, Justice.

We are called upon to determine whether the district court erred in not providing Michael E. Young with appointed counsel at a probation revocation hearing. Concluding that the failure to do so was error, we reverse and remand…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API