State v. Young
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
833 P.2d 911 (1992)
122 Idaho 278
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Michael E. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 19106.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 1992 Term.
June 24, 1992.
Daniel P. Featherston, Sandpoint, for defendant-appellant.
Larry J. EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., and Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.
BISTLINE, Justice.
We are called upon to determine whether the district court erred in not providing Michael E. Young with appointed counsel at a probation revocation hearing. Concluding that the failure to do so was error, we reverse and remand…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.