Legal Opinion

Robles v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed and matter remitted to respondent Superintendent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondents concede that it was error to deny petitioner’s request for the names of the correction officers on the gallery *1038at the time of the disturbance resulting in the charges against petitioner. Respondents further concede that the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating inmate rules 104.10, 107.10 and 116.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [5] [i]; [8] [i]; [17] [i]), to which petitioner pleaded not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Ligreci v. HonorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Giano v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ANDERSON, STEVEN v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Anderson v. New York State Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Anderson v. New York State Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API