Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. City of Miami

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 3, 1981No. 77-1856Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., Circuit Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part,

joined by GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges:

Because the Court’s decision, as set forth in the per curiam opinion, modifying the district court’s decree to eliminate its provisions as to police promotions, and remanding the case to determine whether the government has a right to claim relief as to promotions is not in accord with the facts as reflected by the record or with controlling legal principles, I respectfully dissent. The per curiam opinion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API