Legal Opinion

King v. Smoot

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1924No. 14232PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This was an action by defendants in error, plaintiffs below, for the purpose of recovering the sum of $107.58 for work performed and material furnished in making certain repairs and improvements on real estate described as lots 13 and 14, block 57, city of Broken Arrow, Tulsa county, Okla., and asking for the enforcement of a mechanic’s lien on said premises. The contract was oral between defendants in error and John W. Widdoes, who then owned the property. In so far as the defendant John W. Widdoes, who employed the plaintiffs to do said work, there is no question as to his individual…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willson v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API