Legal Opinion

Ferber v. Brueckl

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaues, J.

This is an action for slander. Upon a trial had before a jury in the circuit court of St. Charles county there was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1500.' Defendants appeal.

No bill of exceptions was filed and the case is therefore before us on the record proper. The abstract of the record contains a motion for a new trial and a motion in arrest of judgment; same, however, were not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions, nor does the record disclose that defendants excepted to the overruling of said motion; therefore, same are not considered on this appeal.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schmisseur v. KreilichIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Cameron v. CameronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Kerone v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Hill v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API