Legal Opinion

Mayre v. Pierson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1931No. 30761PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiff is the owner of lots 14 and 15, with the improvements thereon, in Park Place subdivision of the city of Shreveport. He brought this suit to have declared inoperative as to his property the inscriptions of four certain judgments against W. W. Armistead, who is the husband of Mrs. Lillian W. Armistead, one of his ancestors in title. Plaintiff predicates his demand on the claim that the property in question was the separate and paraphernal property of Mrs. Armistead at the time of the rendition and recordation of the judgments.. The court .below decided in favor of the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liquidators of Prudential Savings & Homestead Soc. v. LangermannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Holloman v. Alexandria & Pineville Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. Barnes v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Hutts v. Crowley Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Reagan v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  2. Betz v. RiviereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. Fontenot v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Treigle v. Acme Homestead Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  5. Bagala v. BagalaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API