Hennigan v. Hennigan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SEARS, Justice.
Hoover, Cox and Miller, a Houston law firm, represented Appellee in her divorce action with Appellant. Subsequently, Hoover, Cox and Miller obtained a judgment against Appellant for attorney fees in the amount of $3,596.00 plus interest and court costs, and filed an Application for Turnover pursuant to TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 3827a (Vernon Supp. 1982-1983). The judge granted the application and appointed a Receiver. In two points of error Appellant contends that the trial court erred in appointing a Receiver because the “prerequisites” of art. 3827a had not been met and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arndt v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pace v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Brasher v. Carnation Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3Cited by32 opinions
- Santibanez v. Wier McMahon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Hammett v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Ross v. 3D Tower Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Childre v. Great Southwest Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.