Legal Opinion

Hennigan v. Hennigan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1984No. C14-83-075CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Justice.

Hoover, Cox and Miller, a Houston law firm, represented Appellee in her divorce action with Appellant. Subsequently, Hoover, Cox and Miller obtained a judgment against Appellant for attorney fees in the amount of $3,596.00 plus interest and court costs, and filed an Application for Turnover pursuant to TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 3827a (Vernon Supp. 1982-1983). The judge granted the application and appointed a Receiver. In two points of error Appellant contends that the trial court erred in appointing a Receiver because the “prerequisites” of art. 3827a had not been met and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arndt v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Pace v. McEwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Brasher v. Carnation Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Santibanez v. Wier McMahon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Hammett v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Ross v. 3D Tower Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Childre v. Great Southwest Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API