Legal Opinion

In re Wysback

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 28, 1923No. 2038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

Albert Wysback and Moses Makad were Syrians, who had been living in the United States for eight or nine years. They had each of them taken out their “first papers” for *762naturalization. In October of 1920 they went to Canada in order, as it appears, to bring into the United States two or three Syrians who had come to Canada. They attempted to smuggle these Syrians into the United States, but were arrested in Vermont. They were indicted for conspiracy to evade the immigration laws of the United States, and were tried before a jury in Vermont, but the jury disagreed and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Gegiow v. UhlSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. In re O'SullivanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Ex Parte SaadiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. United States ex rel. Natali v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Ex parte FragosoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1926
  5. United States ex rel. Natali v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API