Legal Opinion

Albany Loan & Finance Co. v. Tift

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1931No. 20831PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. An instrument in the form of a bill of sale may be so worded as to secure a present, past, or future indebtedness; that is, any or all of such indebtedness. Leffler Co. v. Lane, 146 Ga. 741 (92 S. E. 214); Skinner v. Elliott, 17 Ga. App. 511 (85 S. E. 759); Troup Co. v. Speer, 23 Ga. App. 750 (2) (99 S. E. 541). The notice under such a recorded lien does not appear to be limited to transactions inter partes (Bank of Cedartown v. Holloway-Smith Co., 146 Ga. 700, 92 S. E. 213), the rule with regard to third persons being that the lien for future advances must be indicated in the security…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hester v. GairdnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Farkas v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Leffler Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Bank of Cedartown v. Holloway-Smith Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Skinner v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Americus Finance Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Kelley v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Wilson v. NaumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API