Legal Opinion

Tudor v. Kennett

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 13, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal in Chancery, Windham County. Heard at Chambers, on December 20, 1913, after remand as reported in 87 Yt. 99, on the orator’s motion that a time and place be fixed for an accounting upon the final decree for the orator, as affirmed on appeal, and on defendants’ motion for leave to file their answer. The motion was denied and this was granted. The orator appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

This case was heard in the court below on demurrer to the bill, as amended, the demurrer was overruled, the bill adjudged sufficient, and a decree rendered for the orator according to the prayer of the bill. From this decree, defendants appealed. At the hearing in Supreme Court, the defendants asked in their brief, in the event of an affirmance of the decree, that the cause be remanded with leave to the defendants to plead or answer. The orator, in his brief, insisted that the defendants, having elected to proceed under rule sixteen instead of under rule fourteen, of the rules of the court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gray v. PingrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1845
  2. Aiken v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
  3. Abbott v. SandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  4. Priest v. Foster & JaquithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
  5. Tarbell v. TarbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Page v. Page's AdministratorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Ludlow Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API