Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norton v. Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 22, 2018No. Supreme Court Case 16SC112Published

1DissentJustice Boatright

¶20 An amendment to the Colorado Constitution prohibits the State from using public funds “directly or indirectly”' for abortion services. Colo. Const, art. V, § 50. That language is very broad. It makes clear that state funds are not to be used in any way to fund abortion services. The amendment does not mention the State’s purpose for using the funds. In fact, the words “intent” or “purpose” are completely absent. Nevertheless, today the majority creates a “purpose” requirement and grafts it onto the amendment. But the plain language of the Constitution does not support such a purpose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Warne v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Keim v. Douglas County School DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API