Legal Opinion
Bartel v. Clarenbach
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 1, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
114 N.J. Super. 79 (1971)
274 A.2d 841
PAUL BARTEL, EXECUTOR UNDER THE WILL OF DANIEL L. CLARENBACH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ETHEL CARNATHAN CLARENBACH, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 1, 1971.
Mr. Paul Bartel for plaintiff.
Mr. Reginald F. Hopkinson for defendant (Messrs. Jeffer, Walter, Tierney, DeKorte, Hopkinson & Vogel, attorneys).
TRAUTWEIN, J.S.C.
There are two matters before the court. The first is an order to show cause why plaintiff should not distribute the remaining corpus of the estate of Daniel Clarenbach in accordance with plaintiff's informal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adele H. Dodd and William A. Dodd, Executors of the Estate of John A. Dodd, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Donnelly v. RitzendollarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Case v. RoeblingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- In Re BurnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Gesner v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Probate of Will of ReillyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- In Re Estates of FernandezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Estate of Lansing v. StateNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Estate of Sommers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017