Legal Opinion
Foster v. Foster
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 1986No. 49564PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Clarence Foster appeals from the denial of his motion to quash a garnishment in aid of execution upon a judgment for child support. The marriage of Clarence and Barbara Foster was dissolved on May 5, 1969. Barbara was awarded custody of the two girls born of the marriage and Clarence was ordered to pay support in the amount of $15.00 per week per child. The trial court found that Clarence was in arrears in child support payments in the sum of $12,804.28. In his motion to quash this garnishment Clarence alleged that he made the required weekly payments until…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Rodgers v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hart v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Askins v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Higgins v. McElweeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bramlet v. OwsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mora v. MoraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Boland v. State, Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Norwood v. NorwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Budt v. BudtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989