Seley v. Southern Pacific Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Zane, C. J.:
This action was instituted by the administratrix of the estate of the late William H. Seley, to recover damages to his widow and children, in consequence of his death, occasioned, as alleged, by the negligence of the appellant. The deceased was employed by the appellant as a conductor on its freight'train, and while endeavoring to make a coupling at Wells, a station in Nevada, one of his feet became fastened in an open frog, and he was run over by a car and killed.
It appears from the evidence that blocked or cast-iron frogs are used in many tracks. In these the point of. the space…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877
- Devlin v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Plank v. N.Y. Central and Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Linden v. Anchor Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- O'Neill v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Anderson v. Daly Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- H. T.C.R.R. Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. FowlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.