Legal Opinion
Brooklyn Waterfront Terminal Corp. v. International Terminal Operating Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Brooklyn Waterfront Terminal Corp., hereafter called Brooklyn, seeks to recover damages to a pier allegedly caused by dredging operations conducted by or on behalf of the defendant, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., hereafter called International. Defendant denies liability, asserting in general that the damage to the pier was due to defective conditions existing prior to the dredging.
*703Brooklyn, the owner of Pier 3, located at the foot of East 19th Street, Gowanus Canal, Brooklyn, New York, leased it to International in April 1956 for a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weirton Steel Co. v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Matter of City of N.Y. (Piers Old Nos. 8-11)New York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by15 opinions
- Elaine Jones v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Canal Barge Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- State Of Oregon v. Tug Go-GetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Oregon v. Tug Go-GetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. S/S HermosaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.