Legal Opinion

Emmet v. Bowers

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 15, 1862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to substitute Catharine Emerson plaintiff in these suits.

1Opinion of the Court

Bosworth, Ch. Justice.

It appears by affidavit that issue was joined in this action, April 1, 1847. It was referred to three referees the 27th of May, 1848 ; it was submitted to the referees on the 5th of December, 1850. John Marks was restored to the control of his property, June 1, 1851. He assigned all his property to Catharine Emerson, August 15th, 1853. He died on the 25th of January, 1854. This motion was noticed to be made on the 24th of May, 1862.

Two of the referees are dead, and the cause is undecided. It is a matter of course to vacate the order of reference.

The actions, as I infer…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Smith v. HarringtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Anheier v. SignorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lecocq v. PottierNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Berls v. Metropolitan Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API