Legal Opinion
United States v. an Article of Drug, Etc., Acnotabs
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 2, 1962No. C-694-61 and C-476-62 (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, District Judge.
An action in re to, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 334, was commenced by Libelant by filing of Libel of Information in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on June 12, 1961, to accomplish seizure of 219 individually car-toned bottles of a product described as “Acnotabs” and to obtain a decree of condemnation of the seized product on the ground that it was a drug introduced into interstate commerce and misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 352(a). Pannett Products, Inc., a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels, More or Less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, Douglas Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. 449 Cases, Containing Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sharon Rachbach, and Cross-Appellant v. John M. Cogswell and Saul N. Davidson, and the Public Trustee of the County of Arapahoe, State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Rosen v. Brookhaven Capital Management, Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Frontier Fibreglass Industries, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Metal Processing, Inc. v. HummDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999