Wade v. Whalen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrencePope, Presiding Judge
I concur in the opinion because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff Wade did not show due diligence in serving defendant Whalen. Nevertheless, I am concerned with the standard of “greatest possible diligence” in evaluating Wade’s attempts at service, and I recommend abandoning this standard except in instances in which the defendant has not been served and *771raises a service defense in his answer.
The standard of “greatest possible diligence” in the context of assessing a plaintiff’s attempts at service outside the statute of limitation was first used by this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roberts v. BienertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Sykes v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Patterson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Walker v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.