Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wade v. Whalen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1998No. A98A0068Published

1ConcurrencePope, Presiding Judge

I concur in the opinion because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff Wade did not show due diligence in serving defendant Whalen. Nevertheless, I am concerned with the standard of “greatest possible diligence” in evaluating Wade’s attempts at service, and I recommend abandoning this standard except in instances in which the defendant has not been served and *771raises a service defense in his answer.

The standard of “greatest possible diligence” in the context of assessing a plaintiff’s attempts at service outside the statute of limitation was first used by this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. BienertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Sykes v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Patterson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Walker v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API