Legal Opinion
State v. Warren
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 11, 1979No. 1 CA-CR 3221, 1 CA-CR 3222 and 1 CA-CIV 4256PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Chief Judge.
The thrust of this appeal rests on the allegation that the appellant/defendant, Nathan J. Warren, Sr., did not get the benefit of his plea agreement which he claims he entered into in good faith and fully performed to the best of his ability. We must determine if the trial court erred in finding that the defendant breached the plea agreement, thus freeing the state from any obligations under such agreement.
In September 1976, the defendant was indicted by the Maricopa County grand jury for twenty counts of grand theft by false pretenses. In February 1977, a second…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Robert Nathaniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. George M. VerrusioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.