Legal Opinion
Chimento v. Fuller
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 2007No. 2006-CA-01494-SCT, 2001-IA-00057-SCTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This case involves the distribution of proceeds from a court-ordered sale of 31.3 acres of land located in Pearl River County, Mississippi, and whether the statute of limitations applies to a loan creditor. Gerald D. Mills, Sr., seeks the proceeds from a judicial foreclosure sale. Mills, however, never filed a foreclosure action on his $35,000 promissory note to preserve his interest in the real estate as collateral. In addition, Mills never filed suit on the note to preserve his monetary interest of $35,000. We find that this case should be reversed and rendered.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MS Credit Center, Inc. v. HortonMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Stephens v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of USMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Sarris v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- ABC Mfg. Corp. v. DoyleMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Ellis v. Anderson Tully Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of Russell Puckett v. Carol ClementMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Univ. of Miss. Med. Ctr. v. McGeeMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Estate of Russell Puckett v. Carol ClementMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Rushing v. Trustmark National BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
- Rushing v. Trustmark National BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.