Legal Opinion

Manning, Cushing & Co. v. Alger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery District Court. —Hon. A. B. Thobnell, Judge. Action upon a claim filed in probate. There was a demurrer to the claim as presented, a iudgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

To a proper understanding of the questions involved in the case it will be necessary to set out the claim as originally filed, with the amendment. They are as follows:

“The said Manning, Cushing & Co. claims of the said W. S. Alger, a.s administrator of said estate, the sum of five hundred and ninety-six and forty-hundredths dollars, as per the following statement, less credits, with ten per cent, interest: December 15,1885, one promissory note, $596.40, with ten per cent, interest from date, and exchange, copy of same hereto attached, marked ‘Exhibit A,’ signed, J. T. Ingman, guarantied by D.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank Herman & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Bishop v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Manning, Cushing & Co. v. AlgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API