Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1965No. 43476Published

1Opinion of the Court

253 Miss. 602 (1965)

176 So.2d 307

ROBINSON, et al., APPELLANTS

v.

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, et al., APPELLEES

No. 43476.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 14, 1965.

Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Morse & Morse, Jackson, for appellants.

L.V. Russell, M.M. Roberts, Hattiesburg; Eaton, Cottrell & Lang, Gulfport; Dent, Ward, Martin & Terry, Teller, Biedenharn & Rogers, Vicksburg; Gwin & Gwin, Brandon, Brandon, Hornsby & Handy, Laub, Adams, Forman & Truly, Natchez, for appellees.

PATTERSON, J.

This suit involves title to approximately 83 acres of land, and certain oil royalty payments…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Cock v. AbernathyMississippi Supreme Court · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API