Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is well settled in this State that, where a purchaser of mortgaged lands from the mortgagor assumes and agrees to pay the mortgage thereon, he ' becomes personally liable therefor, which liability inures to the benefit of the mortgagee, who may enforce it in an appropriate action. Felker v. Rice, 110 Ark. 70; Walker v. Mathis, 128 Ark. 317; Kirby v. Young, 145 Ark. 507; and Beard v. Beard, 148 Ark. 29.

Counsel for the defendants recognized this as the rule laid down by this court, but claim that the personal liability of a grantee asuming the mortgage is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Felker v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Kirby v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Walker v. MathisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Beard v. BeardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Swan v. BensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCown v. NicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Trent v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Central Life Ins. Co. of Illinois v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Elliott v. CravensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Cunningham v. Federal Land Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API