Legal Opinion
Davis v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-3294Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIDGET DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 24-3294 (RDM) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Bridget Davis and Jesse Diaz, proceeding pro se, have filed a “Petition for Redress of Grievance for Constitutional Violations, Wrongful Acts and Challenge to Congressional Act Under the Federal Tort Claims Act.” Dkt. 1 at 1 (Compl.). Their claims arise out of two earlier proceedings that they filed in other federal district courts—the Northern District of Indiana and the Western District of Texas. Id.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wright v. Foreign Service Grievance BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Bellecourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Caldwell v. KaganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.